SIZE DISPARITY OF FORCE

Size Dispartity

“Defensive Tactics With Flashlights” by John Peters (1982) pp. 156-158.

The chart is from Juste David Myers – the work cited was an unpublished manuscript (“Close Quarter Combat” 1982), which doesn’t appear to have ever gone to print.  Nevertheless, the matrix shows a presumptive survival ratio based on physical size.

Peter’s book primarily is an instructional manual on the tactical use of a large Maglite style flashlight.  However, in his MAG 20 class, Massad Ayoob referenced this book for the Size=Disparity of Force matrix, which is linked above for your reference and self-defense library to augment your understanding of the use of force – AOJ.

There is no substitute for expert instruction – seek it out.

______________________________________________________________________________________

David and Goliath:  The classic size – disparity of force confrontation.  Goliath clearly demonstrated ample ability, opportunity and threatened jeopardy.  David armed himself with an effective range weapon and stopped the threat. >more<

Osmar_Schindler_David_und_Goliath
Philistines fail to adopt the latest technology

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s